as weird as it sounds no spoilers please in case theres more than I know about lmao. Better or Worse? Loved the game. This isn't just about Witcher - just knowing that XYZ character dies in Game of Thrones isn't a reason to not see it for example. Guess my mind is made up. as …

It gives Geralt a nice close and you get some fun time with Regis which is a fantastic character. EDIT: After seeing all the positive comments, I think I am going to go home and buy it.
Blood and Wine? No. Hearts of Stone is a bit shorter.
It's wonderful.

Blood and Wine is definitely worth playing. Blood and wine … Any advice would be appreciated thank you? But it is long.

Now in this case, what he heard is barely a spoiler. It ultimately came down to who I hated the most.. O'Dimm or Olgierd. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Blood and Wine is great as well. PS. Even better, just replay the main game to get the best ending.

Yeah that would probably be best but I would need to give it a decent amount of time before I went through it again since it’s a pretty big time commitment. Blood and Wine is great as well. Note: This is ONLY to be used to report spam, advertising, and problematic (harassment, fighting, or rude) posts.

As in, do they add more meaningful story and successsfully wrap up everything that is Geralt? Loved the game. My dumbass managed to spoil myself by accident online and I'm kicking myself over it. Blood and wine is a fine ending to the adventure. BaW is the Citadel DLC of The Witcher series. It strongly affects some people's experience. I found more worth … Blood and Wine also has several things that long time fans will appreciate. I need to have geralt's story to conclude in my mind.

However, if the expansions add story that can't be missed, well, thats like reading the Lord of the Rings series and stopping before the last book. When you do youll know why and thank me for the advise.

Blood and Wine?

If you enjoyed the main game you need to play the expansions, no question about it - the overall quality is on par or perhaps even better. I found more worth in the new armour sets … Blood and Wine is more like a departure from the Witcher 1 to Witcher 2 to Witcher 3 story line, pretty much independent with only a few references to the past. Not to mention the Detective Roach On The Case quest, which is easily the most hilarious moment in an entire DLC full of hilarious moments.

Hearts of Stone is sadly short and what you described. Get on it and bleed it for every second it has to offer. It’s also a great endingfor Geralts personal story but if your no longer invested I can understand you skipping it (or at least taking a break). Since I know it’s supposed to take place 3 years after and there is a epilogue at the end that ties things up I’m wondering if It’s worth playing now. 's across the sea if I want coin now. I had to after mainlining vanilla and HoS, so I did.

However, I have lots of other games that I need to play and beat (the numbers of games that came out this year is staggering and I can't keep up with my 13 hour work days). Hearts of Stone is a bit shorter. Blood and Wine also has …

Other than that there's a house to decorate and maximize, new armor/dyes, and some fun new monsters. The thing I love about Blood and Wine is its rich and vibrant color pallette.

However, I have lots of other games that I need to play and beat (the numbers of games that came out this year is staggering and I can't keep up with my 13 hour work days).

What do people here think about Blood and Wine compared to Hearts of Stone?

I've enjoyed the game, but I really want to move on to something else. If that's the case, I'm going have to bite the bullet and get them both. it is better to do Blood and whine AFTER the main storyline.

Please remember to flair your post and tag spoilers or NSFW content. The thing I love about Blood and Wine is its rich and vibrant color pallette. Все торговые марки являются собственностью соответствующих владельцев в США и других странах.

And I all I wanted to do the whole time was get Geralt out of that terrible situation.

It was an easy choice in the end as I really hated O'Dimm fro m the beginning.. Absolutely worth it. HoS is much better. My question is, are the expansions worth it? Blood and wine as a cohesive standalone region/story/game is palpable. The Vampire is out of the bag by the time the intro is over, so yeah still super worth it. Thank you for such a well written answer mate.

But blood and wine is like a whole new game in itself and would definitely recommend, Ah okay, thanks a lot man I was a bit worried I’d ruined it for myself . Maybe dont delete the game, play some other game, and switch back later, when you got the time. People engage with media in different ways. But maybe take a break before doing so. I really appreciate it and that makes me feel much better about starting it . As others said, their identities is a very very tiny portion of everything that dlc has to offer. Blood & Wine is in a whole new map area, and there is very little reference to Witcher 3. Great story, it's a little longer than HoS, and of course gray areas in quests throughout. Hearts of Stone may be shorter but I felt like it had a much more interesting story and WAY more interesting characters, considering most of them weren't from any of the books unlike Blood and Wine. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. I would say, buy it. It's that the writing of said content is miles above the garbage put out by Bethesda and Bioware. Lol who are the vampires? Awesome thank you.

yeah! The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. It has the biggest impact on your soul. Press J to jump to the feed. Thats nothing compared to the whole story of the DLC, its really small part of it. Oooo.. Thanks for the honest feedback. My son loves Roach and whats me to ride around on him all day.. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. I cannot comprehend someone being so burnt out on Witcher 3 they’d never come back to it. It's really like a whole game unto itself. The plot has superb pace and variety throughout. I don't want to spoil anything but there is one quest in particular that is a direct callback to the Witcher 1. All things related to The Witcher... Books, games, TV-series... You name it. The main selling point of W3 isn't simply that it has MOAR CONTENT than almost all other open world games. All trademarks are property of their respective owners in the US and other countries. But I loved its story. Just wanted to get Geralt out of that messed up situation. PS. Thanks everyone. Blood and Wine's central story weaves a series of local short stories into an escalating threat. beat main game. Best Witcher game in the series. the dlc still has wonderful stuff to offer outside of that :). It doesn't feel right to no see Geralt's journey all the way to the end anyway.

then do B&W. Absolutely worth it. If that's the case, I'm going have to bite the bullet and get them both. How have you not played it yet? Best Witcher game in the series. But its important to note that this was my first ever witcher game, so I came into it with zero investment in the characters. The story in B&W is better than the base game, but a lot of the side quests aren't as good. HoS is much better. Все права защищены.

It is what many companies would release as a full game, at the price of an expansion pack. Just because you know one twist in the story doesn't mean you know how the story got there, all the other twists etc. It's definitely worth it.

However, if the expansions add story that can't be missed, well, thats like reading the Lord of the Rings series and stopping before the last book. It gives Geralt a nice close and you get some fun time with Regis which is a fantastic character. ), Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский).

Alright since the story of B&W is getting such praise I'll take it on. So is Blood and Wine something that YOU JUST CANNOT SKIP, or is it just more of the same in a new region? © Valve Corporation.

Hearts of Stone is sadly short and what you described. Hearts of Stone and Blood and Wine worth it? Cookies help us deliver our Services. Toussant is beautiful and fun to explore. So in conclusion, it sounds like a good continuation of geralt's story and not just a bunch of filler? Fellow Witchers, I just finished the base game and Hearts of Stone and I loved it. Uh yeah its totally worth playing. There's so much more to the story than that. Gameplay is build upon with new sign and mutation variations. Hearts of Stone is a bit shorter. Guess my mind is made up. Часть географических сведений на этом сайте предоставлена, Español - Latinoamérica (испанский Лат. The thing I love about Blood and Wine is its rich and vibrant color pallette. I was stuck between literally the devil and an asshole that deserved whatever he got. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. It's absolutely fantastic and worth every penny.

I know if I uninstall this I'll probably never reinstall. HoS was amazingly written and executed, but emotionally left me upset. Thanks everyone. Yea, the ending on the main game only has a minor effect on the DLC (a few dialogue options). In general spoiling yourself like that isn't as big of a deal as some people make of it.

That all said. Blood and Wine is MASSIVE; a whole country of quests.