] The reason given by the school superintendent for this segregation was that these children needed special help in learning English. We can sometimes provide need-based exceptions to these rules.

Id., Vol. An allegation that the trial court erred in denying the motions was the sole basis of petitioner's appeal.

Texas Association of Business v. Texas Air Control Board, 852 S.W.2d 440 (Tex.1993). (Signed by Judge Nancy F. Atlas) Parties notified. Your Study Buddy will automatically renew until cancelled. In selecting jurors, the jury commissioners work from a list of names. ] In Juarez v. State, 102 Tex. 406 Argued: January 11, 1954 Decided: May 3, 1954. Amended Pleadings due by 5/7/2010 Joinder of Parties due by 5/7/2010 Pltf Expert Report due by 5/28/2010 Deft Expert Report due by 6/23/2010 Discovery due by 7/9/2010 Mediation due by 10/20/2010 Dispositive Motion Filing due by 7/28/2010 Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 7/28/2010 Joint Pretrial Order due by 10/12/2010 Docket Call set for 10/20/2010 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom 9F before Judge Nancy F. Please try again. Constitution. ] We do not have before us the question whether or not the Court might take judicial notice that persons of Mexican descent are there considered as a separate class. Although the Court has had little occasion to rule on the question directly, it has been recognized since Strauder v. West Virginia, U.S. 128, 130 The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case. 311 The Court further clarified that the Equal Protection Clause does not require proportional representation of all of the various ethnic groups that make up a community on every jury. (Dunn, James) (Entered: 02/22/2010), JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Rey Hernandez, Ali Suliman Qattom, filed. With them on the brief were Maury Maverick, Sr. and John J. Herrera. The exclusion of otherwise eligible persons from jury service solely because of their ancestry or national origin is discrimination prohibited by the Fourteenth Amendment. 3, c. C, p. 45.

IV, pt. (Dunn, James) (Entered: 02/05/2010), CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Ali Suliman Qattom, filed. 14,000 + case briefs, hundreds of Law Professor developed 'quick' Black Letter Law.

HERNANDEZ v. TEXAS(1954) No. Prior to the trial, the petitioner, by his counsel, offered timely motions to quash the indictment and the jury panel. But as this Court has held, the system is susceptible to abuse and can be employed in a discriminatory manner.

Argued Jan. 11, 1954.

100 ] See Akins v. Texas, supra, note 16, at 403. 334 Firefox, or The decisions of this Court U.S. 475, 478] U.S. 89, 92 To do so, he relied on the pattern of proof established by Norris v. Alabama,

406 Argued: January 11, 1954 Decided: May 3, 1954. R. 83. [ do not support that view. On the courthouse grounds at the time of the Even though 14 percent of the county was Hispanic, none had served on juries for at least the last 25 years. In that case, proof that Negroes constituted a substantial segment of the population of the jurisdiction, that some Negroes were qualified to serve as jurors, and that none had been called for jury service over an extended period of time, was held to constitute prima facie proof of the systematic exclusion of Negroes from jury service. (sashabranner, ) (Entered: 10/12/2010), Letter from Norman Roser re: Settlement Reached, filed. Ct Reporter: ERO..Docket control order to follow. Courtesy of Jamail Center for Legal Research, Tarlton Law Library, The University of Texas School of Law, Documents Time Period: 1946 - 1970, 1800 Congress Ave.Austin, TX 78701 • Map it, IMAX Information: (512) 936 - 4629 Tickets: Email Us, Wedding dress worn by María de Jesus Treviño de la Garza Falcón, Signed autograph letter from Thomas Jefferson to Henry Dearborn, August 17, 1821, Lieberman cigar roller, Finck Cigar Company, All content © Bullock Texas State History Museum. U.S. 282, 286 See Marden, Minorities in American Society; McDonagh & Richards, Ethnic Relations in the United States. Every Bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below: PLUS: Hundreds of law school topic-related videos from The Understanding Law Video Lecture Series™: Monthly Subscription ($19 / Month) Annual Subscription ($175 / Year). ; Cassell v. Texas,

The petitioner's initial burden in substantiating his charge of group discrimination was to prove that persons of Mexican descent constitute a separate class in Jackson County, distinct from "whites." 2

Does the Equal Protection Clause apply to discrimination against any group that is considered a separate class within a community and singled out for different treatment?

9