Radiation), T = 10,000,000 to 1,000,000,000 years - a primordial magnetic field. When entities and species differ, evolution moves forward.". Consciousness is an internal awareness of new ways of being that could liberate us from these destructive behaviors. The illustrations that accompany that paper are *hilarious*. Again. We need much more before we can think about the Grand Unified Theory.
cfA2 was found to align with the Sloan great wall recently discovered in 2005 to have over 1.3 billion light year long connecting filament. Vanessa D’A is presenting a level 101 article. My awareness of "tapping into the creative energy of the universe" is more than an intellectual pursuit. Who among all these does not know that the hand of God has done this? It can be easily argued for by using the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
Einstein’s General Relativity is an equation that describes the relationship between the Universe’s ‘shape’ (spacetime) and its content (matter and energy), at both local scale (planets, stars, BH) and global scale (whole Universe, from Big Bang till now).
There are no such things as the term “hyperclusters”, and it is probably just another fiction made up by you to support your own wrong specious arguments. What’s going to happen to the universe in the future?
Follow us on Twitter: @universetoday distant. As for the rest of what you say is plainly wrong and unsubstantiated.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUHI67dh9jEO2rvK–MdCSg, Support us at: https://www.patreon.com/universetoday The claims of lars (and other plasma cosmology supporter like iantresman, Mr. Hologram, etc.) Much of this data is based on measured redshifts back in 1983. ), Oh the nonsense that occasionally makes it to the arXiv. By all means GO FOR IT! PC/EU nutters would say anything, do anything, to keep up this crazy illusionary pretence. ), And in turn these correlate with the inflationary potential when it dominates the vacuum energy AFAIU.
it seems that dumb, uneducated people like me still have all the same questions we did back in edwin hubble’s day when we first found out it was all expanding. So to begin with, you have this ‘high density energy pulse’, then the ‘inflation event’. The bang in the big bang is really not inflation. The generation of the magnetic fields observed in galaxies and clusters is still unclear. He is the ultimate quote that buries you and other EU/PC nutters views; “On very large scales, the observed Universe is well approximated by a homogeneous and isotropic Friedmann solution of Einstein’s equations.
Nash asked if cosmological principles could be an alternative way to guide human behavior. but also the creation of the very small (particles, photons, quanta.)
She has over 40 years of teaching, administration and curriculum development experience. Physicists (ahem, Hawking) and writers on physics do themselves a disservice with laymen when they use terms like “nothing,” and that is only compounded with phrases like “literally nothing” (with “nothing” italicized at that). It has been shown that phase transitions in the early Universe, even if they do generate magnetic fields, have not enough power on large scale to explain the observed large scale coherent fields”, Nothing better than slaying all this nonsense with the basic fact… (Please feel free to quote this ad nauseam every time one of these total crazies like Mr. Hologram et.al. Currently there are 8,795,326 articles in total here and no one solitary mention of hyperclusters. There is a Planck mass as well, which is the mass-energy quanta of a black hole at this size. …
Inflation is an appealing theory for a number of reasons. If one wants to posit particles coming into and out of “existence” or the universe “suddenly” appearing out of “nothing” you have an obligation to explain those terms better, or else explain why our current knowledge breaks down at these levels.
If you want to be seen that way, then so be it. Tasks are done for the good of the whole over individualism. big bang section. “WIKIpedia is reputable science.” Eh? It’s not there because we haven’t seen them !!! galaxy clusters. and learn how it expands. There was no time either. Why is that one wonders … or not. http://www.universetoday.com/83197/chandra-captures-giant-ring-of-black-holes/ and Benjamin Oppenheimer? But there will be no end for the evolution of the universe as a whole in the eternal inflation scenario, and at present we do not have any reason to believe that there was a single beginning of the evolution of the whole universe at some moment t = 0, which was traditionally associated with the Big Bang.”. RUBBISH! Blah, blah, blah… even more gobbledegook from the fraudulent resident nutter. So what happened next? “Hyperclusters” is a myth created by pseudoscience frauds known as PC/EU nutters. A commitment is made to co-create with Earth.
Falsity with age dating the baby universe, is really from the denial of further Larger sized structural formations requiring longer time to form then superclusters, called “Hyperclusters”. Fang saw the filaments twice by precise line of sight view along their length that extended 350 million light years from a huge black hole that aligns with the sculptor wall of galaxies supercluster.
Sorry, you are well out of your depth here, and it is perfectly clear you are no scientist. I checked all his submissions, and all the Wikipedia facts about superclusters, galaxy_filament, cosmic filament, hypercluster, etc are copyright and bound to Wikipedia, and have no author whatsoever listed as its author ! https://www.amazon.com/Universe-Today-Ultimate-Viewing-Cosmos/dp/1624145442/, Audio Podcast version: https://www.universetoday.com/newsletter, Weekly Space Hangout:
I’ve quit cussing Crumb out, for Nancy. There is nothing wrong with not understanding General Relativity – there is something very wrong with not understanding it and then claiming that it is all incorrect and that the evidence says proves it. Your statement that big bang is a failure is similar to creationists who claim evolution is on the cusp of complete failure, when just the opposite is the case. They seem to think it is perfectly OK that these crazy personal theories to be acceptable, and us few bunnies here who are doing all the work denying the nonsense, while they expect everyone to behave themselves and “be nice” against the insults of the pseudoscience. (Just look at the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WMAP_2010.png It looks like it is all sky to me! In 2017, my religious community, the Sisters of St. Joseph of Springfield, Massachusetts made a Chapter Commitment: "To live in deeper union with all creation and reverently care for Earth, that all may be one.". The problem I have with all of this Big Bang business is: ‘selective ignorance’; and by that I mean selectively ignoring the Laws of Physics as are already known to us by observation and experiment. (Assuming the physics of black holes is correct, and you certainly assert that it is correct at every opportunity.). No being a cruel person, i won’t expose you to the truth.] We could be inside a hyperclusters surrounded by AGN radio sources and not even know it unless we could zoom out well beyond the horizon of the visible universe that dates the big-bang expansion. the universe is to deep to imagine that the big-bang explains things smaller and larger everywhere. What would the world and our service to people look like if individuals practiced the cosmological principles? (See the link I gave, figure 1. ITunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/universe-today-guide-to-space-audio/id794058155?mt=2 Remove all PC/EU from Universe Today, and there would not be the problem in the first place! Cosmology is the scientific study of the Universe, being the place where everything known exists. Over the years, I read many books on ecology from the experts: Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Thomas Berry, Brian Swimme, Mary Evelyn Tucker, John Grim, Margaret MacIntyre, Wangari Matthai, Miriam MacGillis, Elizabeth Johnson, Ilia Delio and so many more. began with the, T = 300,000 to 10,000,000 years - However the equation doesn’t tell us what possible Universes look like, it’s just the common law that all possible Universes have to abide with. and they will be introduced in the Now calling the kettle soot jet black, eh? Damn not being able to see appearance of the posted text… Again; ” yet the very clear observation evidence (often across many Disciplines) say the current accepted cosmology is right.”.
It’s one of the most pressing questions in cosmology, and likely one that will be around for a while. can questions like: what was before the universe, is there anything outside of it and what is at the center of a black hole ever really be answered?
There can be no equivalence between observable conformations (“filaments”) or degrees of freedom (“information”). Don’t suppose you’d be a sock-puppet or acquaintance of those guys by any chance, would you? 3) You talk about mythical hyperclusters, when there is no such thing used by any cosmologists, astronomers or astrophysicists. When Hubble discovered the first galaxy, it made the universe so much bigger. I also read that any consideration of ecology must include the larger functioning of cosmology (study of the universe.). Believers in the big-bang model are guys still living in their past outdated teachings denying and neglecting new discoveries ! It’s just the same with evolution, thermodynamics, plate tectonics or any other well-established theory/body of knowledge.
(Could it be you Mr. Hologram? So logically, like me, I guess Benjamin Oppenheimer must be a Big Bang supporter!
…and Nancy Aitkenson still wants us to “be nice”!! The true is we are still uncertain of early galaxy formation, and the reason you and clearly of the mark is your open denials of the nature of redshifts, the expanding universe, shows you have absolutely not idea what you are rabbeting on about.